Paste your Google Webmaster Tools verification code here

Survey: Google & Wal-Mart Are Preferred Banking Options

 

At least it looks that way, according to a recent survey.

 

Accenture surveyed 4,000 Americans regarding their banking preferences and opinions. The most general findings show a trend toward a more technological, relationship focused experience:

 

bank study

 

 

The younger generation, targeted as 18-34 year olds, showed more interest in technology than their older counterparts, which is no surprise given the fact that they’ve almost exclusively grown up in a technological world.

 

“Younger bank customers are nearly twice as likely as older customers to consider switching to a branchless bank and to consider banking with major technology players if those companies offered banking services.”

 

This is where non-financial institutions, such as Google and Wal-Mart, can sway the younger crowd from traditional banking institutions. They are less concerned about convenient locations and plentiful ATM locations than they are with having access to real-time information and mobile opportunities to do their banking.

 

Wal-Mart started the trend by offering the lowest prices on money orders and check cashing. They more recently teamed up with American Express to offer Bluebird, which is a pre-paid card that can be used like any debit or credit card and makes financial tasks simpler and with no ties to a financial institution. Furthermore, according to a Washington Post article, there are no credit checks and the cards can be used at ATM’s. This is appealing to some, and analysts predict that it could be a game changer in banking competition.

 

Similarly, respondents shared that they would be more willing to partner with PayPal and sign up for Square, as they already have relationships with this well known company. The survey asked how likely respondents would be to conduct banking activities through well known brands, including Google, Apple, T-Mobile, and Costco, if they offered such services. In looking at the chart below, it looks like consumers would consider banking with them:

 

bank chart

 

 

Given this new arena of competition that banks have not seen before, coupled with the results of this survey, what are banks to do? Here are some key takeaways from the survey:

 

1. Strike a balance: with two age groups with two separate sets of needs, it can be difficult for banks to remain competitive while offering “something for everyone.” One striking result that banks can work toward is the high response rate for those feeling that banking is transactional, not relationship focused. Similarly, a good number of respondents claim to want banks to proactively suggest products or services, and be more of a help with bigger financial needs. The relationship aspect can go a long way with both age groups, and banks can use this as a guiding post for making sure that transactions, no matter how simple, build on the customer relationship.

 

I noticed at my bank recently that the drive-thru experience was a little different and I believe aimed at that relationship aspect. When I pulled up to the speaker, I was greeted by the teller’s face on a screen right outside my window. While it startled me, I thought it was a nice touch to add to the personalized effect of the transaction – it wasn’t just a voice behind a tinted window.

 

2. Look forward: the younger group is the next up and coming generation of consumers. Incorporating technology and advances to the way consumers use banks is a must, if it’s not in place already. This generation has grown up with a sense of immediacy and convenience. To stay competitive, banks need to gauge their efforts and marketing strategies to capture this younger generation.

 

Take a look at your bank’s demographics with regard to age – this can help determine your next steps in offering services, mobile technology, and the like. Target your younger customers and survey them to see what their satisfaction levels are now, how aware they are of the full suite of available services, and what they’d like to see as a customer. Taking this step can help determine next steps.

 

Technology has made competition more fierce in almost every industry, and it looks like banking is no exception. Staying competitive in a “bankless” industry can be a challenge, but one that can be met with success.

 

 

Share

Sales Follow Up: Make Sure One Hand Knows What the Other Is Doing

 

This seems to be the week for interesting tales from real life….this time as it relates to following up with customers, or potential customers.

 

I called a medical-related referral service to help my mom find a dentist in the area. The call went very well, but I wasn’t sure about some details and said that I would call back if I needed further assistance, but for now was all set. I thought that was the end of the experience.

 

And then the calls started coming in. Many calls over a two day period. Way too many in fact. I counted, from my voice mail messages, five calls the first day and four or five the second. While that was a minor annoyance (I’m sure they get commission for a successful referral and really were only doing their job), I listened to my voice mail messages – all of them – and realized that there were different representatives calling me to follow up on my inquiry, sometimes within an hour of each other.

 

How did this happen?

 

There must not have been a record on my file from John Smith stating, “attempted to follow up on this date at this time” so the next person looking at my file wouldn’t try to call me an hour or two later.

 

On the third day, there were no calls, so maybe files only stay active for 48 hours before they are considered closed. I’m not sure. But, the experience left me wondering a few things:

 

1. This is a long standing, reputable (as far as I know) referral service – is business that slow that I’ve been the only call in weeks, so everyone wanted a chance at giving me a referral?

 

2. Do they not keep accurate records of customer contact? I know when I talked to someone, they said they could retrieve an old file of a past referral if need be, so I know they keep records of some sort. The rapid fire calling could be perceived negatively by a potential customer, and even if they had every intention of calling back to use the service, this may change their mind.

 

3. What is their follow up procedure? Are all follow up contacts from the previous day given to all of the representatives so that whoever gets to them first gets to talk with them (and their business if that’s how the company operates)? What would have happened if I talked to Joe Smith and got a referral, but Peggy Sue didn’t get that message (due to poor record keeping) and called me just a few hours later? It can send the wrong message either way.

 

Following up and staying on top of potential customers is good business, no doubt. Having a specific plan in place is too. It’s good to remember that even if a customer doesn’t do business with you this time, if the overall experience was good, they may remember you next time they are in need of your product or service.

 

Share

They Ask The Right Questions, But Then What?

 

Staff, especially at the point of sale, are trained to ask certain questions or follow a certain path during each customer transaction. One of those questions might be, “Did you find everything okay?” This is a standard retail question, and one that most customers likely respond to with a “yes.”

 

What happens when a customer says, “No, actually….”

 

This happened to a friend recently in a grocery store. She did not find a particular item she was looking for, but finished her shopping and proceeded to the checkout. The cashier asked that standard question, to which the reply was, “Actually, no. I was looking for xxx and couldn’t find it. Is this something you carry?”

 

The first response from the cashier was more or less described as a deer in the headlights look. She did not have a response right away, and didn’t know how to answer the question. To her credit, she did try to find someone who did, and that person stated he wasn’t sure and went to look for it. However, he never came back, and at the end of the transaction, which wasn’t very long, there was never another mention about whether or not the store carried the product.

 

If a business expects staff to ask specific questions or go through a certain process when interacting with customers, it’s wise to make sure that all staff are trained to be able to answer the questions, find someone who does know the question if it’s something they can’t answer, and ensure that at the end of the contact, the customer’s inquiry was responded to as fully as possible.

 

In this instance, providing staff at the registers with ongoing training to ensure they are familiar with product offerings, or even keeping a sort of “cheat sheet” of available items can help an interaction be successful.

 

I found this interaction interesting, and one that highlights the importance of training, empowering employees and arming them with the knowledge to be successful, and continually monitoring staff performance to ensure the highest quality of service possible.

Share