Paste your Google Webmaster Tools verification code here

Jet.com Failing to Rival Amazon

When news of Jet.com emerging as a new e-commerce site whose goal was to beat the Amazon giant, there was much speculation as to whether this could happen, and if so, HOW it could happen. Amazon is well established as an e-commerce leader and continues to improve every year.

The most recent struggle was with delivery fulfillment during the holidays. Though they tried, news circulated a week before Christmas that the company admitted they could no longer guarantee Christmas delivery on many items unless they were specificially marked for two day delivery. They blamed fulfillment partners, as indicated by a statement on their website in the days leading up to Christmas, which stated, “this year’s holiday gift rush has led to nationwide shipping delays that have affected many of our fulfillment partners.”

Sounds like they had a difficult time of their first holiday season. Where else has the retailer struggled since their launch?

Originally, the site was charging membership fees of $50 annually for customers to use their site. Lower prices rivaling their main competitor were being offered, and the company’s thought was that money would be made from the membership fees. However, they failed to find success with this model, and, in October, the company dropped their membership fees. This could potentially keep the company from being able to compete with Amazon’s low prices, yet another hurdle in the startup’s first year.

Delivery dates are another work in progress in the coming year. When news broke about the possibility of not living up to Christmas delivery promises, the Chief Customer Officer, Liza Landsman, revealed in a Forbes interview that they hope to provide exact delivery timeframes in 2016, as opposed to the estimated delivery time frames currently being offered to customers.

It sounds like their first year is almost under their belt, and came with a few bumps in the road, as to be expected. However, despite their challenges, it sounds like they had a great year – the company reached their goal of $44.9 million in gross merchandise sales, and just reached the 2 million member mark.

It remains to be seen if jet.com, or any other e-commerce site for that matter, could ever give Amazon a run for their money. Jet is surely trying, and the next two years will give better insight as to whether or not they can make their dream a reality.

Share

Enhance Your Mystery Shopping Program in 2016

 

With a new year fast approaching, taking a good look at your current mystery shopping program is important, especially if you’ve had the same program for some time. Here are some ideas for sprucing up your program in 2016:

 

    • Is it time to raise the bar? Hopefully you’ve been watching your company’s performance over time and seen some improvement. If so, that’s great! If you’re finding that your performance scores are consistently coming in exceptionally high, it might be time to raise the bar, especially if your program is in its second or third year. When programs start, especially when a formal mystery shopping program has not been in place before, the program touches on the most basic customer service expectations to ensure that service levels are consistent. Over time, changes take place based on the mystery shopping reports, and things improve. Now it may be time to take it to the next level – incorporate some of the “higher level” performance behaviors. For example, incorporate scenarios to ensure that staff are providing correct information to customers. Pinpointing common customer questions or concerns can give companies “scenarios” for mystery shoppers to use while conducting shops.

 

    • Don’t focus solely on brick and mortar: onsite shops are vital, but don’t forget about your website or even telephone interactions – those are equally important in the customer journey and should not be overlooked. If you’re not using mystery shopping for these touch points, 2016 is a good time to start.

 

    • Social media mystery shops: social media customer service has become commonplace; because of the speed with which social media travels, ensuring that staff respond in a timely and accurate manner is important. This is an emerging tool for companies, and utilizing mystery shopping to ensure service levels are strong can be useful.

 

    • Look to additional services to supplement your mystery shopping program: mystery shopping touches on the objective aspects of service. If you’re not using the more subjective tools, such as customer feedback or social media monitoring, you may be missing a piece of the puzzle. Another emerging tool is Quality Call Monitoring. This service allows for evaluation of actual customer service calls. The calls are evaluated using a report similar to a mystery shopping program and can be extremely useful in evaluating “real life” situations.

 

Customer service expectations have grown significantly in the last two years; ensuring that you have the tools in place to monitor, measure, and evaluate your company’s performance is vital. With a new year on its way, it’s a great time to re-evaluate and enhance your company’s customer experience measurement programs.

Share

Mystery Shopping Uncovers Satisfaction Vs. Operational “Fails”

 

Mystery shopping evaluates the customer experience from an operational standpoint. Many questions shoppers answer revolve around the mechanics of customer service – did the employee suggest an additional item, did they mention the store’s return policy effectively, were they able to answer questions well. Often times, there are more subjective questions at the end that ask shoppers if, based on this experience, they would return to the store and/or recommend to friends and family.

 

It’s always interesting when a report reveals that many of the mechanics did not happen, yet the shopper indicated that overall their experience was positive and they would be very likely to return. On the surface, it doesn’t make sense, but let’s unpack it a bit….there is a lot more value to this “inconsistency” than may be realized.

 

It’s important to follow the “would you return” question with a “why or why not?” This will give you insight into the shopper’s perception, and what it was that made their experience positive – maybe the employees didn’t upsell or hit certain performance points, but remember – this is a company standard, and most customers don’t realize that a “good” experience, as viewed by the company, is when the employee hits the required performance standards.

 

The overall experience questions are great in that they give additional consumer insight into what it is that is good (or not so great) about your business, and what may be important from a customer perspective.

 

On the flip side, it’s important to remember that the performance standards are also very important, and need to be executed consistently in order to maintain sales, customer retention, and aspects related to that.

 

It’s also very important to find out what made an experience positive and compare it to the performance standards to look for inconsistencies. This may help identify areas in which customer service levels may hinder the overall experience without the customer realizing it. For example:

  • A mystery shopper reports that part of what made the experience positive is that the employee answered all of his/her questions well. However, in reading the narrative component, it’s noted that while the employee provided answers, they were not correct. This results in the shopper (or customer) thinking they have information, though it is not correct. The next time they visit a location, this may come up again, and they may get a different (read: correct) answer that is not consistent with what they were originally told. This may lead to a sense of distrust and decrease the chance for repeat business.

 

  • Customers don’t know what they don’t know: it’s interesting when employees should be mentioning certain points to customers during an interaction, whether it relates to upcoming events, special financing options, or something similar. This is not mentioned to the customer, yet a typical customer will not know it exists, so they think they’ve received the best service possible. However, internally the company will know that the customer was not fully educated about all of their options. If they make a purchase today and later find out that there were other options/better prices/features they were not offered, it will not bode well for the company.

 

We have seen instances in which shoppers, through the guidelines and questions they are required to report on, deem their experience as less positive than they would have given the fact that the employee did not do some of the required behaviors; knowing now that these are items that should be offered, they feel as though they were not assisted to the fullest potential. Interestingly, this happens less with questions that focus on cross selling or upsell, and more on items where employees should be mentioning promotions directly related to the items of interest.

 

Mystery shopping reports provide a wealth of information beyond the question responses and narrative detail; digging deeper into the content of the report and looking for correlations can give your program even more value than realized.

Share