Paste your Google Webmaster Tools verification code here

Banking News: Mystery Shopping Uncovers Bad Advice, Fines Incurred

 

Mystery shopping is an often used tool for companies to monitor the customer experience and ensure that employees meet key operational standards. Sometimes, though, it can uncover more than that.

In the last 15 years, Ann Michaels & Associates has found that clients often times learn more about operations from their mystery shopping reports. Shoppers have reported a variety of additional information through keen observational and reporting skills, including:

  • Incorrect product information
  • Misinformation provided to customers, showing a trend by geography, which indicated that training procedures were not properly followed in a particular region of the company
  • Employees, who are disgruntled or simply being overly honest, suggesting to customers that they visit the competitor because the prices are better

Most recently, an article out of the UK illustrated how a mystery shopping program uncovered the fact that bad advice was being offered to customers, likely as a result of the staff not following proper procedure in learning more about the customers and their financial situation prior to offering advice and suggestions.

Santander UK was recently fined 12.5 million after regulators employed a mystery shopping program which revealed significant failings in providing financial advice to customers. The exercise showed that Santander UK was deficient in the following areas:

* failed to make sure that its advisers were fully getting to grips with customers’ personal circumstances before making a recommendation, including understanding how much risk they were willing to take;

* failed to ensure that customers investing were given clear and not misleading information about its products and services;

* for Premium Investments, failed to carry out regular ongoing checks to ensure the investment was still meeting customer needs;

* failed to make sure new advisers were properly trained before being allowed to give investment advice; and

* failed to properly monitor the quality of investment advice which meant that, where poor advice was given, it was not always picked up.

Financial advice is a tricky subject, and consumers need a lot of help and guidance in this area. Unfortunately, for those who do not know much in this area tend to rely heavily on advisors, and trust that they are providing the customer with accurate information and make suggestions that are best for them. In this case, it uncovered the fact that this was not happening, and much of it revolves around training and monitoring of the staff.

When consumer trust is broken, especially on a large scale such as this example, it’s hard to recover as a company. When this concern was first brought to light, Santander UK made the decision to halt advice offerings at its branches, and ultimately closed down the division. It’s a sad ending for this story, but its one that highlights the importance of continually monitoring staff performance, knowledge, and insight, especially in the area of financial investments. It’s better to implement an ongoing measurement program in a proactive manner to pinpoint challenges early on rather than finding out the hard way.

 

Share

Who are the 2014 Customer Champions?

 

JD Power released their list of top 50 2014 Customer Champions. Who are these companies? JD Power looked at over 600 companies across nine industries, focusing on five factors that JD Powers refers to as the “Five P’s”: People, Presentation, Price, Process and Product.

 

JD Power 2014

 

These companies excel in providing outstanding customer service, according to its customers, not only in their industry, but overall. Finbarr O’Neil, President of JD Power, says that “”Not only does satisfaction encourage customer loyalty, but happy customers also become advocates of the brand to others. Particularly given the ability of today’s consumers to easily communicate their experiences far and wide through social media and online reviews, customer advocacy can be critical to a company’s bottom line.”

 

Companies who achieve this status find that it all starts with hiring – finding the right people to promote a customer centric environment, training the staff to be able to make decisions that allow them to solve customer issues quickly and independently, and providing an environment that promotes longevity in the workplace.

 

Another key aspect these companies share is listening – listening to both customer and employee feedback to find ways to improve the customer experience.

 

By employing these standards, companies create satisfied customers who are not only loyal in terms of repeat business, but also for being brand advocates through word of mouth. This is important for companies, especially when it comes to social media and its relevance when it comes to customer experiences. The chart below is from the JD Power study, and shows the percentage of consumers who will be likely to return to a business and recommend it – you can see the stark difference in percentages between those companies on the Champion list and those that are not:

 

JD Best in Class

 

 

 

Companies can mirror what the champions do in terms of careful planning from the ground up to ensure that their customer service is top notch. Taking a close look at what these companies do compared to your company’s procedures, making adjustments where needed, is a good first step in focusing on your customers’ overall experience and satisfaction.

 

 

Share

Case Study: Mystery Shopping Reveals Disconnect in Referral Program

 

Ann Michaels & Associates recently conducted a study to show representation for companies who relay on referral services to gain new business. As an online and telephone referral service, customers are able to contact the referral company to disclose their needs. From there, the referral company pairs them with the best match based on their specific situation.

 

The study revolved around the online portion of the business, as referral members were concerned about their representation based on the fact that business generated from this company was down quite significantly. The client set out to pinpoint how customers were being referred and how the process works for potential customers.

 

Starting at the referral service’s website, mystery shoppers were deployed to pose as potential customers that would best align with the client’s services. Being instructed to enter specific criteria, the shoppers went through the referral process, and took screen shots of every page they encountered. Additionally, when their options for companies was offered, they took a screen shot for the client to investigate further.

 

The client found several areas in which their brand was not being represented accurately or sufficiently, which was likely the cause for lower lead generation. These issues included:

 

1. Despite the fact that shoppers provided information indicating that the client was the most relevant fit for their needs, they were often times not one of the suggested companies, or if they were, they were consistently one of the last offerings on a long list of company options.

 

2. Their pricing structure was not listed correctly on the page with potential companies to hire; in fact, they were listed at a higher rate than many of the competitors, despite the fact that they have made their pricing structure clear with the referring vendor at the onset of their relationship.

 

3. Only when their company was selected as a vendor did potential customers see more accurate (and many times, lower) pricing.

 

4. In general, shoppers found that the process was a bit difficult, with many steps that were not clear or easy to understand in order to get to the referral section. Shoppers consistently indicated that, as a true customer, they would have become frustrated and aborted the process before finding a company to work with.

 

At the conclusion of the project, the client had enough documentation, especially with regard to screen shots of the experience, to talk with the referral vendor to address some of the issues. A repeat project conducted after promises of resolving the client’s issue yielded much better results.

 

By providing screen shots directly in the mystery shopping reports. the client was able to easily identify issues that prohibited new business while getting a good understanding of what potential customers experience.

 

As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. Or, in this case study, it’s worth not missing any more business opportunities.

Share