Paste your Google Webmaster Tools verification code here

Mystery Shopping During The Holidays?

 

It’s interesting to see how companies use mystery shopping programs, and how they adjust their schedule of shops during certain times. We are into one very interesting period of the year – the holiday season – where companies are mixed on ideas for their mystery shopping programs.

 

We’ve seen some companies opt to reduce their programs during the holiday shopping season, citing that customer traffic is much higher, and they want to focus on holiday traffic and not have mystery shoppers “take up” time that can be spent with true customers.

 

Interesting concept, and in a way I can see the point. For example, we would never send shoppers into retail venues on Black Friday, unless it was requested by the client. This is a completely non-typical shopping day, and any results gained at that time would not be truly reflective of service standards (possibly).

 

However, there are other retail and restaurant clients that actually increase frequency during the holiday shopping season. Their thinking is that this is when the bulk of their sales come into play, and with all of the competition out there, they have to be on top of their game. Mystery shopping is used to measure their service levels, and they watch reports very carefully and make adjustments as needed to ensure that holiday shoppers keep coming back to them.

 

With that said though, I do see value in adjusting frequency based on typical consumer traffic. Park districts, for example, tend to be busier in the summer months and, for those with fitness center options, at the start of every new year when people are making resolutions to lose weight or become more fit. There are lulls in traffic patters during slower times of the year, and mystery shopping programs are reduced slightly, not only to keep costs down, but to mirror customer traffic.

 

Another example is based on performance. Some businesses, especially with several locations, may employ a performance based schedule. For example, if a  particular location scores over a specific percentage for several months in a row, their frequency will decrease. Conversely, locations who score under a specific percentage will receive a follow up shop within two weeks, or their frequency will increase.

 

Companies need to consider the benefits of the mystery shopping results when determining frequency of their program. We are always a slave to budgets, but mystery shopping programs have great value and can actually save money in the long run.

Share

Customer Feedback Case Study: “Wrong Answers” Change Consumer Perception

 

When customers provide feedback about your company, you have a great opportunity to listen, acknowledge, and engage with that customer. As we know, this can build loyalty, positive word of mouth, and increased satisfaction levels.

 

It’s important to remember your audience when a customer comes to you with feedback or questions, though, and gauge your response carefully.

 

Hasbro found this out the hard way. A six year old girl was playing a popular board game, Guess Who? and noticed that there were more male characters than female. She wanted to know why, so her mom drafted an email to the company based on her daughter’s question.

 

Hasbro responded; however, the response was not geared toward a six year old:

 

Dear R___, 
Thank you for your email. Please find below an explanation which I hope your mummy will be able to explain to you. 

Guess Who? is a guessing game based on a numerical equation.  If you take a look at the characters in the game, you will notice that there are five of any given characteristics.  The idea of the game is, that by process of elimination, you narrow down who it isn’t, thus determining who it is.  The game is not weighted in favour of any particular character, male or female.

Another aspect of the game is to draw attention away from using gender or ethnicity as the focal point, and to concentrate on those things that we all have in common, rather than focus on our differences. 

We hope this information is of help to you. 

May we thank you for contacting Hasbro and if we can be of any further assistance, either now or in the future, please do not hesitate to contact us again.

Kind Regards,
ASK HASBRO

 

This isn’t something a six year old would understand. When the mother of this child responded to Hasbro, she explained just that, and added that as a 37 year-old she wasn’t entirely clear from Hasbro’s response.

 

The mother then shared this experience on her blog and in her social media venues. Here’s where things were getting interesting and could have potentially gotten much worse had Hasbro not responded again….

 

When the mother shared this experience, people took Hasbro’s response as a gender bias, and people started talking about Hasbro not showing gender equality, only defining females based on their gender, and not knowing how to talk to kids.

 

Yikes. Pretty harsh perceptions based on an experience. Those perceptions, while likely not the case as Hasbro’s response didn’t suggest these ideas at all, are a good example of how consumers can run with a (false) statement and hurt a company’s reputation.

 

Unfortunately, word of mouth can spread quickly, and even if it’s a false claim, if that’s how a consumer is perceiving your brand, they will talk about it as truth. You can see how this could have gotten much worse.

 

Thankfully, Hasbro responded a second time to the mother, this time in a much more child-friendly version:

 

Dear R____, We agree that girls are equally as important as boys and want both boys and girls to have fun playing our games. When you play the Guess Who? game, you have the same chance of winning the game whether you picked a card with boy or a card with a girl. 

We love your suggestion of adding more female characters to the game and we are certainly considering it for the future. In the meantime, you will be pleased to know that we have additional character sheets that we can send out to you in the post if you ask your mum to send us your postal address. Alternatively, you can visit  http://www.hasbro.com/games/discover/guesswho/Guess-Who-Characters-en_GB.cfm  to download and print additional character sheets so you can have lots of different fun people`s faces to choose from. You will be happy to know that our downloadable sports character sheet includes an equal number of boys and girls.


We hope your mum does not throw out your Guess Who game!

 

Now THAT’S a great response! Not only does it speak to the six year old on her level, but it makes her feel valued, as Hasbro suggested that they will consider her suggestions. And, it gave her a value added bonus of being given a link to create her own character sheets.

 

If Hasbro would have responded that way in the beginning, it could have circumvented the brief misperception and negative word of mouth.

 

Lessons learned?

 

1. Show your personality: stay away from canned and/or technical responses. Simply address the concern, in your own words, and use personality when responding.

 

2. Remember your audience: know your consumer base and how to talk to different age groups. Hasbro likely has similar emails from children based on their industry; know how to respond to the younger consumer in their “own language.”

 

3. Your words may been seen by the world: you never know when something you say in response to a customer inquiry/concern will be spread online, especially these days. Keep it professional and respond with the thought that your words may be seen by many others. You should always want to keep a positive imagine of your company in your correspondence, no matter what you’re doing, but like they say with social media “Don’t say anything that you wouldn’t want on the front page of the newspaper.”

 

 

Share

Is Email Dying? Doing Away With Email May Increase Service Levels?

 

As new technologies emerge, older ones are threatened by critics’ potential death sentence…we’ve seen it time and time again. When we, as a society, became more familiar with text messaging, for example, critics suggested that people would no longer communicate via email in the near future.

 

As social media took off, there were critics that suggested that email marketing was going to die. As instant messaging became a big thing back in the day, there were those suggesting that people would turn to instant messaging over email, and email would soon be a thing of the past.

 

A recent article discusses the death of email and why it’s such a bad thing for businesses. The author refers to it as the “Pony Express”, which, given our increasingly rapid fire communication tools available, makes a little sense.

 

Wait…as I’m reading the examples above, it seems as though poor email has really taken a beating over the years! It has managed to survive despite the doomsday predictions, but we are again faced with another death sentence for email, this time related to companies and service levels.

 

I came across this article that talks about the benefits of doing away with email for business. The author shares four ways doing away with email will improve customer service:

 

1. More time to talk with customers: at first, I thought this was leading toward face to face conversations. However, the author shares that options such as live chat, can go a long way in assisting customers quickly and efficiently. I will agree with this one – I much prefer live chat for a quick issue over email.

 

2. Better collaboration: it can be challenging to schedule meetings, share ideas, and collaborate with groups of people over email. Moving to a more traditional boardroom, in person setting is suggested as being more efficient.

 

On this point, I agree that these types of tasks are rather difficult to handle in email. However, because of the way business has evolved, with more and more employees working remotely or trying to collaborate over vast geographical distance, time zones, and the like, I think getting rid of email all together just won’t work. However, using an email to point a group to a Google Doc, online meeting room, or similar venue is an efficient way to manage collaboration.

 

3. Service with personality: customer service is about building relationships, so things need to get personal. The author suggests that doing away with email for customer service, which can consist of canned responses to inquiries, can improve the relationship building.

 

This may be true, but maybe look at other ways to provide personality and relationship building in email correspondence is better. Emails, texts, and other written communication is tricky at best, as people can come off in a tone that’s not intended, and things can get easily misunderstood. However, possibly guiding employees to be more personal and less “canned” in responses will go a long way to improve service levels. Couple that with a quick response time and email is still efficient and useful in the workplace.

 

4. A sympathetic ear: customers want to be heard and feel that they are cared about when they have issues. Similar to the point above, tweaking email communication and ensuring response rates are as quick as possible will address these concerns and make email communication better in customer service issues.

 

Essentially, while the premise of doing away with email sounds like it may be beneficial, I think companies are better served by incorporating new communication tools (such as online chat, social media engagement, etc) while keeping the more traditional tools. Customers still want to communicate with companies in the way they’re most comfortable, and this will mean different things to different people – having multiple channels of communication available, as long as they are providing strong service, is the best way to go.

 

Share